JBL Charge 5 Review: Incredibly rugged and a powerful performer

JBL’s Charge series has always justified popularity, and no more was that true than for the Charge 4. It’s still one of my favourite portable, durable speakers to take on a short trip away. The Charge 5 is a meaningful improvement over its processor, edging that out and reiterating JBL as a company that really goes hard when it comes to their many ongoing series’.

Design

Most of the change happens with the design. Although upon the first look you wouldn’t really be able to tell. Aside from a more pronounced logo and some sleeker curves, the Charge 5 looks very much like the 4. It’s an attractive, cylindrical speaker with physical buttons on top for all your playback standards, and a flap at the bottom-rear for the USB-A port, while the USB-C port isn’t covered. Just because the latter isn’t covered, doesn’t mean the speaker doesn’t sport superior protection. In fact, the IP67 rating is up from the IPX7 rating for the Charge 4, not only owning water resistance but shrugging off dust as well.

It’s clear JBL have finally landed on a design that’s completely resistance to dust ingress, which should make this the ideal camping speaker (for when we’re all able to do those things again).

One interesting difference is the decision to completely do away with a 3.5mm port. Are speakers the new iPhones? Perhaps. But this may have been a necessary sacrifice to make to focus on dust resistance. As such, you’re relying solely on Bluetooth here, which is fortunately incredibly stable and consistent, with no drop-outs even at great distances. Bluetooth standard has improved, of course, jumping to Bluetooth 5.1.

Performance

Similar to previous models, the cylinder design is important. This means the bass radiators at either end of the speaker are able to vibrate more freely, without any constraint. This helps with the speaker’s 65Hz low-end response, which is incredibly strong and detailed considering the speaker could still be considered quite small. Although songs with more sporadic bass patterns can expose the weakness of this speaker when compared to something like the JBL Xtreme 3 – not all nuances are picked up. A song like Mystikal’s Neck Ov Da Wudz has plenty of sub-bass driving the production, and while the heavier parts come across well from the speaker, the lighter, more delicate bass kicks do sound a bit restrained.

Overall, the sound that comes out of the Charge 5 is incredibly impressive. The driver arrangement has changed from the Charge 4, and it’s clear JBL have made some smart engineering choices to bring more presence to the mids and highs without toppling their reputation for party-minded bass.

Battery

JBL claim and deliver on 20 hours of listening time on a single charge, but it can be slightly less if you’re pushing this to max volume the entire way. Keep it at around 70-80% and you should easily get your worth from this.

Verdict & Value

The JBL Charge 5 is much better than the JBL Charge 4; that’s not up for debate. The question is where it’s substantially better to justify an upgrade? Unless you have a particular need for something dust-proof, probably not. The Charge 5 does sound better of course, especially with those clearer, crispier vocals, but the Charge 4 is already quite strong.

That being said, if you aren’t in the Charge game at all, the Charge 5 is absolutely worth the very reasonable $200 asking price. But value won’t really be realised until you’re able to take this out on the road again.

FOUR AND A HALF STARS (OUT OF FIVE)

Highlights: Full dust and waterproofing; slick design feels great to lug around; very powerful bass performance without crumbling in the mids and highs.
Lowlights: Sub-bass can be lacking on some songs; doesn’t justify an upgrade if you don’t need to extra protection.
Manufacturer:
Price $199.95
Available: Now

Chris Singh

Chris Singh is an Editor-At-Large at the AU review, loves writing about travel and hospitality, and is partial to a perfectly textured octopus. You can reach him on Instagram: @chrisdsingh.